I got in a debate with a friend of mine today. She thought it was absolutely ridiculous that she had to fill out a resume and go on an interview for a volunteer position. I sided with the organization on this, which of course left her a little miffed. She’ll come around though.
What’s the reason I sided with the organization? A few reasons popped up in my head actually. For one, as someone who has spent her fair share of college student days working in a volunteer capacity, the biggest reason is commitment. If you are taking the time to apply and go through the interview, chances are you will take the position seriously.
There’s also the team aspect. Very rarely will you be working on your own in a volunteer role. You will be working with a team, so your personality has to be the right fit. Part of the interview, the interviewer is probably asking themselves if the interviewee will be able to gel with the rest of the team.
When I was thinking about volunteering for the USO at the Philly airport, man, did they put you through your paces. However, I completely understood their madness. They wanted to weed out the people who could give the commitment they needed.
Plus, if it’s a charitable organization, I want to know if you can bring any networking to the table. Oh and since a resume summarizes your skills and qualifications, it will allow me to see if you have the necessary skills or training for the position.
It’s a lot like a job, yes, but looking at it from the other side, you can completely understand why it is the way it is.
What say you readers? Is a resume over the top in a volunteer position?